Artifact: Implementation Subsystem
Purpose
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Name |
Brief Description |
UML Representation |
| Name | The name of the subsystem | The attribute "Name" on model element |
| Brief Description | A brief description of the role and purpose of the subsystem | Tagged value, of type "short text" |
| Components | The components directly contained in the subsystem | Owned via the meta-aggregation "owns" |
| Relationships | The relationships directly contained in the subsystem | - " - |
| Diagrams | The diagrams directly contained in the subsystem | - " - |
| Implementation Subsystems | The subsystems directly contained in the subsystem | - " - |
| Import Dependencies | The import dependencies from the subsystem to other subsystems | Owned by an enclosing subsystem, via the meta-aggregation "owns" |
The architect defines the subsystems during Elaboration, and allocates them to individuals (or teams). This is done before class implementation is started, and thus enables parallel development of subsystems.
An implementer is responsible for the subsystem, and ensures that:
The implementer responsible for an implementation subsystem is also responsible for the public (visible) components of the subsystem.
It is recommended that the implementer responsible for an implementation subsystem is also responsible for all its contained components; for more information see Artifact: Component.
If a team of implementers develops an implementation subsystem, one of the team members should be responsible for the subsystem.
It is recommended that you use implementation subsystems. You have to decide how to map packages in design to subsystems in implementation. You have to decide how many levels of subsystems you need.
![]()
|
|